In recent discussions about AI technologies, DeepSeek AI has emerged as a potential alternative to ChatGPT. However, before organizations consider integrating this model, it’s crucial to understand the associated risks. Below, we summarize key findings and concerns about DeepSeek AI, along with an alternative recommendation for those prioritizing data protection and transparency.
Security Risks Highlighted by Kela
The cybersecurity firm Kela, known for its expertise in monitoring cybercrime, has analysed DeepSeek AI and uncovered significant security vulnerabilities. Their findings, detailed in a recent blog post, reveal:
- Potential for malicious use: DeepSeek AI can be exploited to generate harmful content, including malware, violating the principles of the EU AI Act.
Data Privacy Concerns
DeepSeek AI’s privacy practices raise additional red flags, particularly for organizations operating within the EU. The model is developed by a Chinese company, making it subject to Chinese laws. This creates the possibility that user data could be accessed by Chinese authorities. Moreover, the company’s privacy policy (accessible here) includes several troubling points:
- Data storage in China: User data is stored on servers located in China, which poses compliance challenges for EU organizations.
- Lack of clarity on security measures: The policy does not provide detailed information on how data is protected during transfers.
- Broad data-sharing permissions: User inputs can be used for advertising and analysis purposes, without sufficient transparency or the option to opt out.
Why Consider Mistral AI?
For organizations prioritizing privacy and regulatory compliance, Mistral AI stands out as a reliable alternative (Privacy Policy available here). As a European-based model, Mistral AI emphasizes:
- Data protection: Ensuring user data remains secure and processed within strict European regulations.
- Transparency: Offering clear policies and controls over data processing, giving organizations confidence in their AI usage.
Conclusion
While DeepSeek AI may appear to be a promising solution, the outlined risks and privacy concerns warrant careful consideration. For organizations seeking a secure and privacy-friendly AI model, Mistral AI offers a compelling alternative. If your organization requires further guidance on this topic, we are available to provide detailed consultations.
6. Februar 2025 @ 12:23
People like being confirmed in the respective obsessions. Mine tend to shield me from yours. Eat AI, breathe AI, be amazed, amused and bath in your comfortably warm AI Illusion.
Seeing you dispute the advantages of one against the other lightens up my day, for a second.
30. Januar 2025 @ 16:49
What an advertising for Mistral! Should advertising with backlinks not be marked as such?
30. Januar 2025 @ 17:28
Thank you for your feedback! This article aims to provide factual information rather than covert advertising. For a more in-depth understanding, I encourage you to review the privacy policies of both AI models.
30. Januar 2025 @ 11:34
Funny – I don’t remember seeing the same approach for ChatGPT. That means, Americans can have our data, but not the Chinese.
30. Januar 2025 @ 17:37
The article was not intended as a defense of ChatGPT. In fact, OpenAI has implemented strict data privacy measures, ensuring that ChatGPT does not automatically store or use personal data for training. While data protection policies vary across companies and jurisdictions, privacy concerns are a global issue rather than being limited to specific countries.